It wasn't that good.
But while I was watching it, I came up with a simple answer to a long-standing writing question: what is Voice, and why is it so important? So I guess the $6 matinee ticket was worth it.
Here's the wisdom I came up with:
1. There are two parts to any good book: a) the story and b) the writing.
2. The story = setting, plot, characters.
3. The writing = how you present the setting, plot, characters.
In other words, the writing, the way in which you present the story, is the Voice.
In the movie I was watching, the story had everything. A detailed, beautifully done setting that was realistic and interesting. A strong plot that hinged on character development. Characters with clear, obvious motivations and universal appeal.
...but I was bored out of my mind.
It wasn't, to my surprise, the story. I liked the story.
It was how the story was being told. We knew two characters were in love, for example, because the narrator said they were. We didn't see the passion, or fall in love with the girl as the boy did. Nope--the narrator just said they were in love and then boom! The audience is supposed to believe it's Romeo and Juliet all over again.
It also existed in the dialog. I often felt that the characters were reading the script, not reacting to the events of the story. There was a lot of "As you know, Bob," going on in the movie, a lot of voice-over narration telling us how to feel about the situation, and dialog that felt like writer's intrusion, not a natural response.
I liked the setting. I liked the plot. I liked the characters. But put them all together, and I didn't like the movie. I didn't like the writing. I didn't like the way the characters spoke, talked, or acted.
I didn't like the Voice.
This was perhaps easier for me to discover in watching a movie than in reading a novel, albeit I think this is more often a problem with books than movies. Think of a book that you should like--one that is right up your alley. When you bought it, you were excited to find such a jewel. You couldn't wait to read this book. It was like the author peered into your brain and wrote something just for you. Maybe it's a dark fairy tale or a vampire love story or old-fashioned murder mystery, but whatever it is, it is just the kind of book you like.
And you hate it.
It's because the story is there...but the writing isn't.
Let's make up a fictional book--a romance set in the Wild West between a saloon owner and a cowgirl.
- The Story:
- Setting: Wild West. (We can go on to add specific details--what the ranch is like, what the saloon is like, etc.)
- Characters: saloon owner and cowgirl (Again, adding more details)
- Plot: Saloon owner needs cowgirl to invest in his saloon or he loses the bar; along the way they fall in love.
- The Writing:
- Setting: Do the characters love or hate their setting? Why? How does the setting effect them--does the cowgirl long for city life and hate to see the horses? Does the saloon owner almost die in the desert?
- Characters: Go past their physical appearance and their immediate past. What deep-set longings do they have? What do they want with all their heart? Now: never ever tell me what it is they want more than anything. Just show it to me in their reactions. Make the cowgirl grumpy or the saloon owner flirty--but don't tell me they are--show me.
- Plot: This all comes down to reactions. The plot of the story is like a timeline: this happens, then this happens, then this happens. Who cares? The real plot of your writing is showing me the reactions the characters have based on what has happened.
11294 ★ 85000